I remember spending hours playing video games as a kid, grinding away, remembering all the moves, starting from the beginning of a level, popping more quarters in the machine, pausing to think and take a break from time to time. Then I remember my buddies came over with the cheat code (I think I still remember the code to Contra) and the “game” became a joke, you literally couldn’t fail (in this case die). I wonder, on how many different levels, AI appeals to us, making things easier than they should be could be an appeal I see. Although I have not used AI, I have thought my amateur writing might benefit from some tech or could it just really make writing so much less real (I guess fitting the name AI). It just feels and reads so produced,m and inauthentic. I wonder how many times I have read AI generated writing and thought it was really good? To reason and think we will surely depart with the use of AI, as the study is showing, but onto what uncharted sea are we getting ourselves into?
I remember spending hours playing video games as a kid, grinding away, remembering all the moves, starting from the beginning of a level, popping more quarters in the machine, pausing to think and take a break from time to time. Then I remember my buddies came over with the cheat code (I think I still remember the code to Contra) and the “game” became a joke, you literally couldn’t fail (in this case die). I wonder, on how many different levels, AI appeals to us, making things easier than they should be could be an appeal I see. Although I have not used AI, I have thought my amateur writing might benefit from some tech or could it just really make writing so much less real (I guess fitting the name AI). It just feels and reads so produced,m and inauthentic. I wonder how many times I have read AI generated writing and thought it was really good? To reason and think we will surely depart with the use of AI, as the study is showing, but onto what uncharted sea are we getting ourselves into?